(KATE GRAHAM-SHAW is a journalist based in New York City. She covers international news for Japanese media and also covers health and science topics as a freelancer.)
Finally, a scientific explanation WHY we are so biased and divided these days. It is not the enormous amounts of information that bombards us every minute, it is the choices we make in choosing which information to believe. And now scientists show us that how our brains are wired, increases the biases. We always knew that we are biased, but the way we’re “wired” to learn divides us.
The article from Scientific American discusses a study on cognitive biases and how they influence learning and memory processes. It highlights the “halo effect” and “affinity bias,” showing that we are more likely to remember and integrate new information when it comes from people we like. This tendency can lead to polarized views, as we often build understanding from a limited set of liked individuals, reinforcing beliefs that remain unchallenged. The study suggests that these biases in learning could contribute to the intensification of polarized opinions in society.
- Cognitive Biases: The article discusses how our brain’s biases, like the “halo effect” and “affinity bias,” influence our learning and memory processes.
- Study Insights: A study shows we’re more likely to remember and learn from people we like, which could explain the development of polarized views.
- Memory Integration: The research tested participants’ ability to link memories and make new inferences, finding a bias towards information presented by liked individuals.
- Implications: This bias in learning may lead to narrow viewpoints and intense polarization, highlighting the importance of diverse sources for balanced understanding.
The article emphasizes the impact of cognitive biases on our learning mechanisms and the potential consequences for societal division.
Overcoming cognitive biases, especially those affecting learning and memory processes, involves a few key strategies:
- Awareness: Recognize and acknowledge the existence of biases like the “halo effect” and “affinity bias.”
- Diverse Interactions: Engage with a variety of people, not just those we naturally gravitate towards.
- Critical Thinking: Question our own opinions and the information we receive, especially from those we like.
- Education: Learn about different perspectives and the underlying reasons for our biases.
These steps can help us build a more balanced understanding and prevent the narrowing of viewpoints.
[Full Text]
The human brain tends to play favorites. Its prejudices, well demonstrated by psychological studies, include the “halo effect”: if we like a certain quality in a person, we’re more likely to perceive their unrelated traits positively as well. There’s also “affinity bias,” which refers to how we gravitate toward people with backgrounds or characteristics similar to our own.
Now a study shows how cognitive biases could profoundly affect our most basic learning and memory processes. “What we show is not that people are biased; that we already kind of know,” says Inês Bramão, a psychologist at Sweden’s Lund University and co-author of the new study, published in Communications Psychology. “We give an explanation of why people are biased. The fundamental mechanism may be that we are more likely to expand our knowledge based on information provided by people we like.” Such bias could help explain how people develop strongly polarized views.
Study participants first chose “teammates” and “opponents” from among images of random faces based on their like or dislike of the faces. Then they created imaginary personas for each chosen face, giving characteristics and identities they liked to teammates and ones they disliked to opponents.
Next, participants viewed images of each face set in a landscape or other background alongside a common household object, as if the person were “showing” the participant the object. Later, the participants tried to match up objects that had shared the same background—this time, without the faces displayed. This tested their ability to learn new information through a process called memory integration: linking memories of multiple past events to make new inferences. The participants did significantly better when linking objects that had initially been “presented” by a persona they liked, which the researchers say indicates a fundamental bias in how we associate previously learned information with a new, partially related event.
The study authors suggest this finding helps to show how people’s opinions can become intensely polarized and increasingly extreme. If we tend to build understanding based mostly on what we learn from a limited set of liked individuals—largely because of their similarities to us—these beliefs can remain unchallenged, leading to narrowing viewpoints.
Psychologist Charles Stone of the City University of New York says that this study is just the beginning and that further research could move beyond images to test learning with real-world events. “This could have important implications for how people make inferences and connect dots about their beliefs that then match their worldviews,” he says. “There’s a lot of fodder moving forward.”
Recent Comments